Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence (2024)

Abstract

According to Leventhal’s Self-Regulatory Model of Illness, patients have ideas and action plans related to the management of their disease. The aim of this study is to examine whether ideas and action plans relating to hypertension change as a result of general practitioner’s (GP’s) discussing them during consultation, and whether these changed ideas and actions plans affect adherence. The study employed an experimental design, highlighting three conditions: (0) care-as-usual consultation; (1) discussing patient’s ideas about their disorder; and (2) discussing patient’s action plans. Ten GP-trainees performed care-as-usual consultations, were subsequently assigned to a training in either Condition 1 or 2, and performed the trained conversations. Hundred and eight patients with hypertension were consecutively assigned to the conditions, and completed questionnaires a week before, immediately after the consultation, and 1 month later. The training resulted in two new, feasible and different types of conversations that managed to affect some of the patient’s ideas and action plans. It is concluded that the study provided GPs with a tool to discuss illness representations and actions plan of patients with hypertension. Implications for the management of hypertension adherence in primary care are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-258
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Hypertension
  • Self-regulation theory
  • Intervention
  • Patient-physician interaction

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

View full fingerprint

Cite this

  • APA
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • Harvard
  • Standard
  • RIS
  • Vancouver

Theunissen, N. C. M., De Ridder, D. T. D., Bensing, J., & Rutten, G. E. H. M. (2003). Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 51(3), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00224-0

Theunissen, N.C.M. ; De Ridder, D.T.D. ; Bensing, J. et al. / Manipulation of patient-provider interaction : discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2003 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 247-258.

@article{7d517fa16ce34c29800e717489d0f42a,

title = "Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence",

abstract = "According to Leventhal{\textquoteright}s Self-Regulatory Model of Illness, patients have ideas and action plans related to the management of their disease. The aim of this study is to examine whether ideas and action plans relating to hypertension change as a result of general practitioner{\textquoteright}s (GP{\textquoteright}s) discussing them during consultation, and whether these changed ideas and actions plans affect adherence. The study employed an experimental design, highlighting three conditions: (0) care-as-usual consultation; (1) discussing patient{\textquoteright}s ideas about their disorder; and (2) discussing patient{\textquoteright}s action plans. Ten GP-trainees performed care-as-usual consultations, were subsequently assigned to a training in either Condition 1 or 2, and performed the trained conversations. Hundred and eight patients with hypertension were consecutively assigned to the conditions, and completed questionnaires a week before, immediately after the consultation, and 1 month later. The training resulted in two new, feasible and different types of conversations that managed to affect some of the patient{\textquoteright}s ideas and action plans. It is concluded that the study provided GPs with a tool to discuss illness representations and actions plan of patients with hypertension. Implications for the management of hypertension adherence in primary care are discussed.",

keywords = "Adherence, Hypertension, Self-regulation theory, Intervention, Patient-physician interaction",

author = "N.C.M. Theunissen and {De Ridder}, D.T.D. and J. Bensing and G.E.H.M. Rutten",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00224-0",

language = "English",

volume = "51",

pages = "247--258",

journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",

issn = "0738-3991",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

Theunissen, NCM, De Ridder, DTD, Bensing, J & Rutten, GEHM 2003, 'Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence', Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00224-0

Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence. / Theunissen, N.C.M.; De Ridder, D.T.D.; Bensing, J. et al.
In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2003, p. 247-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manipulation of patient-provider interaction

T2 - discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence

AU - Theunissen, N.C.M.

AU - De Ridder, D.T.D.

AU - Bensing, J.

AU - Rutten, G.E.H.M.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - According to Leventhal’s Self-Regulatory Model of Illness, patients have ideas and action plans related to the management of their disease. The aim of this study is to examine whether ideas and action plans relating to hypertension change as a result of general practitioner’s (GP’s) discussing them during consultation, and whether these changed ideas and actions plans affect adherence. The study employed an experimental design, highlighting three conditions: (0) care-as-usual consultation; (1) discussing patient’s ideas about their disorder; and (2) discussing patient’s action plans. Ten GP-trainees performed care-as-usual consultations, were subsequently assigned to a training in either Condition 1 or 2, and performed the trained conversations. Hundred and eight patients with hypertension were consecutively assigned to the conditions, and completed questionnaires a week before, immediately after the consultation, and 1 month later. The training resulted in two new, feasible and different types of conversations that managed to affect some of the patient’s ideas and action plans. It is concluded that the study provided GPs with a tool to discuss illness representations and actions plan of patients with hypertension. Implications for the management of hypertension adherence in primary care are discussed.

AB - According to Leventhal’s Self-Regulatory Model of Illness, patients have ideas and action plans related to the management of their disease. The aim of this study is to examine whether ideas and action plans relating to hypertension change as a result of general practitioner’s (GP’s) discussing them during consultation, and whether these changed ideas and actions plans affect adherence. The study employed an experimental design, highlighting three conditions: (0) care-as-usual consultation; (1) discussing patient’s ideas about their disorder; and (2) discussing patient’s action plans. Ten GP-trainees performed care-as-usual consultations, were subsequently assigned to a training in either Condition 1 or 2, and performed the trained conversations. Hundred and eight patients with hypertension were consecutively assigned to the conditions, and completed questionnaires a week before, immediately after the consultation, and 1 month later. The training resulted in two new, feasible and different types of conversations that managed to affect some of the patient’s ideas and action plans. It is concluded that the study provided GPs with a tool to discuss illness representations and actions plan of patients with hypertension. Implications for the management of hypertension adherence in primary care are discussed.

KW - Adherence

KW - Hypertension

KW - Self-regulation theory

KW - Intervention

KW - Patient-physician interaction

U2 - 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00224-0

DO - 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00224-0

M3 - Article

SN - 0738-3991

VL - 51

SP - 247

EP - 258

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

IS - 3

ER -

Theunissen NCM, De Ridder DTD, Bensing J, Rutten GEHM. Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence. Patient Education and Counseling. 2003;51(3):247-258. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00224-0

Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Neely Ledner

Last Updated:

Views: 6499

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (42 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Neely Ledner

Birthday: 1998-06-09

Address: 443 Barrows Terrace, New Jodyberg, CO 57462-5329

Phone: +2433516856029

Job: Central Legal Facilitator

Hobby: Backpacking, Jogging, Magic, Driving, Macrame, Embroidery, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Neely Ledner, I am a bright, determined, beautiful, adventurous, adventurous, spotless, calm person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.